Chances are that you'll either hate or love the 'relic' idea, with the latter view enhanced if you'd had the fortune to see such a guitar up close.
Fender's Time Machine process is exhaustive to say the least, resulting in a degree of artificial yet entirely convincing wear and tear. Holding a 1959 Relic Esquire, you can almost feel the near half-century of history.
The opposing view is simple: why? What's the point of spending a significant wodge of folding stuff to buy a beat up guitar when you could revel in any one of the more affordable standard guitars?
A fair point too. So, all things considered, how would you feel about a guitar that's been artificially aged, yet has no significant history – certainly when compared against the likes of Fender and Gibson – to speak of?
Welcome two members of the Icon series, artificially aged versions of guitars already nestling in the arms of the Vintage range.
The very first thing you notice upon unpacking and picking up the V100 is the weight. Part of the very essence of Gibson's finest innovation is the sheer mass, and such is the weight of this single-cut that it actually passes the 'closed eyes' test alongside a Les Paul Standard.
The construction is similar too, at least in terms of the wood used: a body capped with a sliver of flamed maple and ultimately comprising two pieces of mahogany, albeit with the join in the region of the rear pot cavity.
Although this is an obvious copy of a world-famous design, simple parody isn't necessarily the whole story behind this and other members of the Vintage range.
Although the V100 is in the ballpark of a late fifties Les Paul, there's certainly no chance of anyone passing it off as the real thing.
That said, the real ace in the hole as far as both guitars here are concerned is the continuing influence of Trev Wilkinson.
Subtle touches such as the authentic look of his WJ44 tuners (the green hue of the tulip pegs is especially believable) against the just-about-perfect yellowing of the logo and inlay speaks volumes regarding the attention to detail within the obvious price-point parameters: even the headstock tapers in just the right way.
So, what about this ageing? "Well, everyone has their own idea as to how a guitar ages but the reality is that each one ages differently so there is no correct way of doing it," offers Wilkinson.
"We needed to go over the top a little bit more than the Time Machine Closet Classic style but not quite as far as a Rory Gallagher!
"We do in fact start with a virtually finished guitar just before it is ready for the final top coat, we then distress it using files, 80 grit abrasive paper, sharpened screwdrivers, Scotchbrite pads.
"Then we sand it smooth and apply a satin lacquer to give it a duller look. This also has the effect of sealing the distressing so that whilst they may look old they do not get any worse as they sit on dealers' walls."
It has to be said that the overall satin finish of this example is below par – we can't find any excuse for splodges of finish and other imperfections. But we applaud the wear applied to the forearm area of the top, around all four controls and by the cutaway.
Any ageing consequentially produces a smoothly worn neck and the V100 is no exception. Demonstrating a wide 'C' rather than a narrow 'U' shape, the guitar plays like the real thing up to a point and, thanks to the woods plus Wilkinson's always impressive WVC humbuckers, sounds credible too.
The strings on our example seemed a tad on the old side (that might be taking the ageing a little too far!) but this actually helped in attaining all manner of Les Paul-esque tones: Page, Slash, Hawkins and many more.
There's plenty of tonal push, neck pickup woof and bridge 'bucker bite, and we have no complaints as regards the fretwork either.
Whole of our offer available at magnusmusic.eu website is subject to 24 months seller's warranty. During this period we also provide door-to-door service. All products in our store are also covered by the manufacturer's OR distributor's warranty.
Every repair covered by door-to-door service is arranged by authorized service points. If you have any problem with the bought product, please contact us at: orders@magnusmusic.eu to determine details.
Procedure for Reporting Illegal Content and Actions in accordance with Article 16 of the Digital Services Act:
Any person or entity can report to the service provider, via the email address magnus@hurtowniamuzyczna.pl, the presence of specific information that they consider to be Illegal Content.
The report should be sufficiently precise and adequately justified. To facilitate this, the service provider allows and facilitates the submission of reports to the above-mentioned email address containing all of the following elements: (1) a sufficiently justified explanation of the reasons why the person or entity alleges that the reported information constitutes Illegal Content; (2) a clear indication of the exact electronic location of the information, such as the precise URL or URLs, and, where applicable, additional information enabling the identification of Illegal Content, as appropriate to the type of content and specific type of service; (3) the name and surname or name and email address of the person or entity making the report, except for reports concerning information related to one of the offenses mentioned in Articles 3–7 of Directive 2011/93/EU; and (4) a statement confirming the good-faith belief of the person or entity making the report that the information and allegations therein are accurate and complete.
The report mentioned above is considered to provide a basis for obtaining factual knowledge or information for the purposes of Article 6 of the Digital Services Act concerning the information it pertains to, if it allows the service provider, acting with due diligence, to determine – without detailed legal analysis – the illegal nature of the activity or information in question.
If the report includes electronic contact details of the person or entity making the report, the service provider promptly sends a confirmation of receipt of the report to such person or entity. The service provider also promptly informs such person or entity of its decision regarding the information covered by the report, providing information about the possibility of appealing the decision.
The service provider reviews all reports received through the mechanism mentioned above and makes decisions regarding the information covered by the reports in a timely, non-arbitrary, and objective manner, with due diligence. If the service provider uses automated means for such review or decision-making, it includes information about this in the notification mentioned in the previous paragraph.