Designed and made in Australia, the M5 is a compact ½” cardioid condenser microphone with low noise and a full frequency response. A result of many years’ experience building the award-winning NT5 microphone, RØDE has succeeded in making a high-quality ‘pencil’ style permanently polarized condenser that will impress even the most demanding of artists and engineers. Ideal for studio recording and live on stage, the M5 is equally at home on a range of acoustic instruments, choirs, or anywhere you would employ a small diaphragm condenser microphone, either individually or as a stereo array. This matched pair has been carefully selected to ensure a variation of no more than 1dB sensitivity between the microphones. A premium foiled certificate is supplied to verify the authenticity of the pair. The M5 is finished with RØDE’s proprietary ceramic coating which offers a sleek matt black finish, and is supplied with WS5 windshields and RM5 stand mounts.
Acoustic Principle | Pressure Gradient |
Active Electronics | JFET impedance converter with bipolar output buffer |
Capsule | 0.50" |
Polar Pattern | |
Address Type | End |
Frequency Range | 20Hz - 20kHz |
Output Impedance | 200Ω |
Maximum SPL | 140dB SPL (@ 1kHz, 1% THD into 1KΩ load) |
Maximum Output Level | 13.5mV |
Sensitivity | -34.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (20.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz |
Equivalent Noise Level (A-weighted) | 19dB-A |
Power Options | |
Weight | 80.00gm |
Dimensions | 100.00mmH x 20.00mmW x 20.00mmD |
Output | |
Warranty | 1 year with free extension to 10 years following registration here |
Whole of our offer available at magnusmusic.eu website is subject to 24 months seller's warranty. During this period we also provide door-to-door service. All products in our store are also covered by the manufacturer's OR distributor's warranty.
Every repair covered by door-to-door service is arranged by authorized service points. If you have any problem with the bought product, please contact us at: orders@magnusmusic.eu to determine details.
Procedure for Reporting Illegal Content and Actions in accordance with Article 16 of the Digital Services Act:
Any person or entity can report to the service provider, via the email address magnus@hurtowniamuzyczna.pl, the presence of specific information that they consider to be Illegal Content.
The report should be sufficiently precise and adequately justified. To facilitate this, the service provider allows and facilitates the submission of reports to the above-mentioned email address containing all of the following elements: (1) a sufficiently justified explanation of the reasons why the person or entity alleges that the reported information constitutes Illegal Content; (2) a clear indication of the exact electronic location of the information, such as the precise URL or URLs, and, where applicable, additional information enabling the identification of Illegal Content, as appropriate to the type of content and specific type of service; (3) the name and surname or name and email address of the person or entity making the report, except for reports concerning information related to one of the offenses mentioned in Articles 3–7 of Directive 2011/93/EU; and (4) a statement confirming the good-faith belief of the person or entity making the report that the information and allegations therein are accurate and complete.
The report mentioned above is considered to provide a basis for obtaining factual knowledge or information for the purposes of Article 6 of the Digital Services Act concerning the information it pertains to, if it allows the service provider, acting with due diligence, to determine – without detailed legal analysis – the illegal nature of the activity or information in question.
If the report includes electronic contact details of the person or entity making the report, the service provider promptly sends a confirmation of receipt of the report to such person or entity. The service provider also promptly informs such person or entity of its decision regarding the information covered by the report, providing information about the possibility of appealing the decision.
The service provider reviews all reports received through the mechanism mentioned above and makes decisions regarding the information covered by the reports in a timely, non-arbitrary, and objective manner, with due diligence. If the service provider uses automated means for such review or decision-making, it includes information about this in the notification mentioned in the previous paragraph.